##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Submitted
Jul 21, 2020
Published
Oct 10, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 309 Download : 325

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to describe and determine ICT education and training, professionalism, and performance of elementary school teachers in KKG Group Telawang, Banjarmasin on the quality of learning. Also, to know the effect of professionalism on the performance of elementary school teachers in the KKG group Telawang, Banjarmasin. The quantitative method with the population and samples from elementary school teachers in KKG group Telawang, Banjarmasin. This research indicates that (1) the objective of improving teacher performance is to realize a good and quality learning process that requires education and training to improve professional competence, performance, and quality of learning, (2)  There is an  teacher professionalism influence on the performance of elementary school teachers in the KKG group in Telawang Banjarmasin with teacher professionalism, (3) There is an influence between ICT education and training on the quality of elementary teacher learning in the KKG group in Telawang Banjarmasin with the education and ICT training, (4) there is an influence between the teacher's professionalism on the quality of elementary school teacher learning in the KKG group in Telawang Banjarmasin and the professionalism of the teacher, (5) There is an influence between ICT education and training on the quality of buyers teachings of elementary school teachers in the KKG group in Telawang Banjarmasin with ICT education and training, (6) There is an influence of ICT education and training, teacher professionalism, and teacher performance on the quality of learning carried out by elementary school teachers who are members of KKG group Telawang Banjarmasin. All of them gave a positive and significant influence in ICT education and training on the performance and professionalism of elementary school teachers in the KKG Group in Telawang, Banjarmasin, which impacted the quality of learning the KKG.

Article Details

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Copyright @2017. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium

Keywords
ICT education and training, professionalism, teacher performance, quality learning
How to Cite
Rakhman, M. M., Dalle, J., & Suhaimi. (2020). Analysis of the Effect of ICT Education and Training, Professionalism and Performance of Elementary Teachers on the Quality of Learning in the KKG Group in Telawang, Banjarmasin . Journal of K6 Education and Management, 3(3), 279-294. https://doi.org/10.11594/jk6em.03.03.01

References

Afshari, M., & et al. (2009). Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communication technology. Interna-tional Journal of Instruction, 2(1), 77-104.
Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 8(1), 136-155.
Bernard, O. (2020). Refutation in Research: How to Improve Publication Quality. Annals of Economics and Statistics, (138), 21-48.
Cassidy, M. (1921). What Is a Teacher? The Journal of Education, 93(16 (2326)), 439-439.
De Witte, K., Titl, V., Holz, O., & Smet, M. (2019). Overview of education systems. In financing quality education for all: the funding methods of compulsory and special needs education (pp. 25-40). Leuven (Belgium0: Leuven University Press.
Erstad, M. (1997). Empowerment and organizational change. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Man-agement, 9(7), 325-333.
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191.
Hakim, A. (2015). Contribution of competence teacher (peda-gogical, personality, professional competence and so-cial) on the performance of learning. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 4(5), 01-12.
Jiang, K., Lepak, D., Hu, J., & Baer, J. (2012). How does hu-man resource management influence organizational out-comes? a meta-analytic investigation of mediating mech-anisms. The Academy of Management Journal, 55 (6), 1264-1294.
Johaneck, C. (2000). Composition research: Issues in Context. In composing research: a contextualist paradigm for rhetoric and composition (pp. 8-27). University Press of Colorado.
Johnson, R. D., et al. (2008). An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66, 356-369.
Kador, T., Chatterjee, H., & Hannan, L. (2017). The materials of life: Making meaning through object-based learning in twenty-first century higher education. In Carnell B. & Fung D. (Eds.), Developing the Higher Education Cur-riculum: Research-Based Education in Practice (pp. 60-74). London: UCL Press.
Kintu, MJ et al. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design fea-tures and outcomes. International Journal of Educa-tional technology in Higher Education, 14(7), 1-20.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2008). The tgree P's of pedagogy for the networked society: personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10-27.
Nixon, P., & et al. (2012). Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(2), 204-216.
Santoro, D. (2011). Good teaching in difficult times: demorali-zation in the pursuit of good work. American Journal of Education, 118(1), 1-23.
Sugiyono (2018). Quantitative research methods. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Taunay, E. (2015). Pengembangan SDM berbasis kompetensi antara pengaruh budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja di lingkungan pendidikan. Jurnal Universitas Pandanaran, 1(2), 1-10.
Trianto. (2010). Mendesain model pembelajaran inovatif-progresif: konsep, landasan, dan implementasinya pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana.
Tóth-Pjeczka, K., Rapos, N., & Szivák, J. (2019). Compo-nents, models and operational mechanisms of teacher collaboration. In Kowalczuk-Walêdziak M., Korzeniecka-Bondar A., Danilewicz W., & Lauwers G. (Eds.), Rethink-ing Teacher Education for the 21st Century: Trends, Challenges and New Directions (pp. 283-299). Opladen; Berlin; Toronto: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
Usman, M. (2011). Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Wehby, J., Symons, F., & Shores, R. (1995). A Descriptive analysis of aggressive behavior in classrooms for children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 20(2), 87-105.
Wiyono, B. B. (2018). The effect of self-evaluation on the principals’ transformational leadership, teachers’ work motivation, teamwork effectiveness, and school improvement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(6), 705-725. DOI:10.1080/13603124.2017.1318960